Zapier Agents alternatives

List the exact apps and actions you need before comparing agent platforms. Check permissions, approval points and the unit used to charge for repeated runs.

Editorial comparison · Updated

Start with what you need to change

A single-purpose video editor or a branded support agent with its own help desk.

Review Zapier Agents pricing and limitations →

Selections reflect documented features and workflow differences. We have not tested every candidate on the same task; order is not a performance ranking.

Evaluate a business workflow

Pricing and setup, side by side

ProductGet startedPricingReview before switching
Zapier AgentsRequires setup

Free includes 400 activities/month. Agents Pro is USD 400 billed annually (USD 33.33/month equivalent) with 1,500 activities/month. Agents are billed as a separate add-on; activities are not ordinary Zap tasks, and a single run can use several activities.

Official pricing ↗

Pricing checked:

Actions consume an activity allowance separate from ordinary Zap tasks
LindyRequires setup

Plus is USD 29.99 per user/month with 3,000 credits; Pro is USD 99.99 with 15,000 credits; Max is USD 199.99 with 35,000 credits. Seats pool credits. Plan allowances do not roll over; purchased top-ups cost USD 10 per 1,000 credits and carry over. Only eligible new teammates joining through Slack get the free week; direct signups are billed immediately.

Official pricing ↗

Pricing checked:

Actions with outside impact wait for approval
GumloopRequires setup

Pro starts at $37/month with a 14-day trial, 20,000 monthly credits and an 8% orchestration fee on model usage. Enterprise pricing is custom; confirm the complete usage bill before subscribing.

Official pricing ↗

Pricing checked:

Usage and the 8% orchestration fee can increase the total beyond the starting subscription.
BardeenRequires setup

An initial credit allowance is available. Continued scraping, qualification and enrichment use paid credits; cost depends on the operation.

Official pricing ↗

Pricing review pending

Scraping and enrichment consume credits

Which alternative fits your workflow?

Lindy

For assistant-style workflows across connected apps. Start with a draft or approval step before allowing external actions.

Lindy

Details checked

Shared AI teammate for inbox, meetings, follow-ups, and other work.

Why it fits The pricing page lists meeting follow-up, inbox drafting, scheduled routines, and broader delegated work, with approval before external actions.

PrepareEmail and calendar connections

GetDraft replies

ReviewConnect inboxes and tools

Keep in mindActions with outside impact wait for approval
Requires setup · Paid

Gumloop

For visually assembling AI workflows. Check connector coverage and how credits and model usage apply to the full run.

Gumloop

Details checked

No-code workspace where teams describe work and run agents across their apps.

Why it fits Gumloop's official index says teams can build agents for CRM updates, meeting briefs, support triage, and call follow-up drafts.

PreparePlain-language task

GetApp updates

ReviewConnect the apps

Keep in mindUsage and the 8% orchestration fee can increase the total beyond the starting subscription.
Requires setup · Free trial

Bardeen

For browser-oriented repetitive tasks. Verify which steps require a live browser session and review extraction quality.

Bardeen

Details checked

GTM agents that scrape, qualify, and export lead lists.

Why it fits Build scraping and AI qualification workflows that turn web information into rows for connected work tools.

PrepareSearch or profile URLs

GetScraped rows

ReviewDefine the scrape and qualification rules

Keep in mindScraping and enrichment consume credits
Requires setup · Free trial · AI workflow

Before you switch

  1. Choose one representative task and keep the original input.
  2. Check account, model, integration and export requirements.
  3. Compare the result, manual corrections and total usage cost.
  4. Keep your existing workflow until the replacement passes your checks.

When keeping your current tool makes sense

Teams that already use Zapier and want an agent to carry work across many existing app actions.

Switching can add migration and training work. If your current tool meets the task and budget, a different feature list alone is not a reason to move.

Explore this category →