AI tool

Braintrust

Visit website

Connect production traces to evaluation datasets while separating data processing, scoring and model inference costs.

Starting price
Pro USD 249/month
Free access
Starter: 1 GB and 10k scores
Billing unit
Data, scores and model tokens
Platform
Hosted developer platform
Verified
26 Oct 2026

Overview

What you provide

  • Send application traces and a labeled evaluation dataset with expected behavior or scoring criteria.

What you get

  • The platform provides trace inspection, experiment comparisons and evaluation scores for reviewing AI behavior.

Choosing this tool

Braintrust is useful when failures found in production must become repeatable evaluation cases. Its unlimited users do not remove data or score charges. Compare PromptLayer for prompt version workflows and request transactions, or LangSmith for per-seat observability and agent deployment. Pick the billing unit that matches the workload you actually instrument.

A decision worked through

On Starter, 3 GB of processed data and 20,000 scores imply (3 - 1) × USD 4 + (20,000 - 10,000) / 1,000 × USD 2.50 = USD 33 in those two overages. This excludes model calls beyond credits. A larger workload does not automatically make the USD 249 Pro fee economical; retention and access controls may be the deciding features.

Braintrust alternatives for ai tracing and evaluation

Compare Braintrust with PromptLayer, LangSmith for ai tracing and evaluation. Compare the published operating scope as well as the billing unit.

ProductPrice / unitFree allowanceInput → outputKey limit
BraintrustRead profileOfficial source ↗Pro USD 249/mo plus usage1 GB; 10k scores monthlyTraces become scored experiments.Starter retention is 14 days.
PromptLayerRead profileOfficial source ↗Pro USD 49/mo plus transactionsFive users; one workspacePrompts become versioned tests.Pro keeps 2,500 included requests.
LangSmithRead profileOfficial source ↗Plus USD 39/seat/mo plus usage5k base traces and one seatAgent runs become inspected traces.Plus includes 10k traces total.

Setup & workflow

  1. Capture a small representative trace set.
  2. Run evaluators against known good and bad cases.
  3. Promote reviewed failures into a regression dataset.
Requirements & installation
  • Instrument one application and prepare representative passing and failing cases before choosing a score budget.

Limits & review

  • An automated score is only as useful as its rubric and examples. Fourteen-day Starter retention may be too short for a monthly incident review, and included model credits are not unrestricted inference.

Your part

  • Check whether evaluators catch real failures and protect sensitive content before including production traces.
Sources & verification5

This profile is based on official sources, not a hands-on product test.

Vendor descriptions and demos document advertised features. Editorial guidance is based on these sources.